Petitions/Review how to turn the MHRA into a fully transparent, patient first regulator
StatusClosed
Opened6 Dec 2024
Closes6 Jun 2025
Government response
Parliamentary debateNot eligible
Milestones

We believe the MHRA should be independently reviewed. This should cover approval and surveillance processes, funding & accountability. It should consider how to ensure the transparency of decisions, prioritisation of patient safety, and how to ensure there aren’t conflict of interests.

A wide range of medicines & devices approved by MHRA have caused patient harm & it often takes too long for action to be taken. We think an urgent review of the yellowcard system is required. We consider that the MHRA focuses too much on clinical trials of new medicines, rather than safety of existing ones. There is a 'revolving door' between industry & the regulator, several board members declare interests. Some information sought through FOIs has not been provided due to commercial interests.

3,680Total signatures
Select your constituency →
10,000
100,000

Constituency engagement ranking

Dr Roz Savage
1Dr Roz Savage MP
South Cotswolds
34
Sarah Dyke
2Sarah Dyke MP
Glastonbury and Somerton
19
Tom Collins
3Tom Collins MP
Worcester
18
Jenny Riddell-Carpenter
4Jenny Riddell-Carpenter MP
Suffolk Coastal
17
Jayne Kirkham
5Jayne Kirkham MP
Truro and Falmouth
17
Helen Maguire
6Helen Maguire MP
Epsom and Ewell
15
Rachel Blake
7Rachel Blake MP
Cities of London and Westminster
14
Danny Kruger
8Danny Kruger MP
East Wiltshire
14
Peter Kyle
9Peter Kyle MP
Hove and Portslade
14
Alicia Kearns
10Alicia Kearns MP
Rutland and Stamford
14
Review how to turn the MHRA into a fully transparent, patient first regulator — Petitions