Petitions/Review how law distinguishes between BDSM/CNC and sexual assault
StatusOngoing
Opened8 May 2026
Closes
Government response
Parliamentary debateNot eligible
Milestones

Review the legal framework which distinguishes BDSM from sexual assault. This framework should guide police and courts in assessing consent, including whether it was freely given, ongoing and could be withdrawn and outline prior discussion, agreed boundaries and absence of coercion or incapacity.

The aim is to ensure that BDSM or CNC (consensual non consent) cannot be used to obscure or justify assault, while providing professionals with clear standards to assess these cases fairly and consistently. As established in R v Brown [1993], consent is not a general defence to actual bodily harm, yet we are concerned that current legal ambiguity makes it difficult for the justice system to distinguish between genuine consensual BDSM practices and cases of domestic abuse or assault.

10,000
100,000

Constituency engagement ranking

Chris Curtis
1Chris Curtis MP
Milton Keynes North
2
Liam Conlon
2Liam Conlon MP
Beckenham and Penge
1
Jerome Mayhew
3Jerome Mayhew MP
Broadland and Fakenham
1
Daniel Zeichner
4Daniel Zeichner MP
Cambridge
1
Ben Coleman
5Ben Coleman MP
Chelsea and Fulham
1
Sarah Jones
6Sarah Jones MP
Croydon West
1
Jim Dickson
7Jim Dickson MP
Dartford
1
Stuart Andrew
8Stuart Andrew MP
Daventry
1
Baggy Shanker
9Baggy Shanker MP
Derby South
1
Danny Kruger
10Danny Kruger MP
East Wiltshire
1