Petitions/Laws relating to children must use "must" not "should"
StatusOngoing
Opened17 Jun 2026
Closes
Government response
Parliamentary debateNot eligible
Milestones

Laws involving children often uses the terminology of the word "should", which we believe leads to ambiguous expectations regarding professional responsibilities. We propose changing this language to "must," thereby establishing a clear legal duty for professionals within the child welfare sector.

Transformation of Terminology: “must” conveys obligation while “should” implies no more than a strong recommendation. We must change all instances of "should" to "must" in current law relating to children, especially: 1. child protection legislation, ensuring that professionals are legally required to adopt a child-centred approach in their practice. This change must affect all future child protection laws to help establish clear legal obligations. 2. parental and carer rights legislation - amend the legislation to guarantee that parents and caregivers have unequivocal rights in legal circumstances, including the recognition that their voices "must" be heard.

10,000
100,000

Constituency engagement ranking

Dan Jarvis
1Dan Jarvis MP
Barnsley North
15
Stephanie Peacock
2Stephanie Peacock MP
Barnsley South
11
Dr Marie Tidball
3Dr Marie Tidball MP
Penistone and Stocksbridge
6
John Healey
4John Healey MP
Rawmarsh and Conisbrough
3
Imogen Walker
5Imogen Walker MP
Hamilton and Clyde Valley
3
Yvette Cooper
6Yvette Cooper MP
Pontefract, Castleford and Knottingley
2
Gill Furniss
7Gill Furniss MP
Sheffield Brightside and Hillsborough
2
Tom Hayes
8Tom Hayes MP
Bournemouth East
1
Emma Foody
9Emma Foody MP
Cramlington and Killingworth
1
Natasha Irons
10Natasha Irons MP
Croydon East
1
Laws relating to children must use "must" not "should" — Petitions